lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.4 status page, lightly updated
    Date
    From
    > > Audit all char and block drivers to ensure they are safe with the 2.3
    > > locking - a lot of them are not especially on the open() path.
    >
    > What about the open() path? They have (or grab) BKL there, so it should
    > not be something special. Now, read() and write()...

    They dont all get open right either ;) And yes a lot get read/write wrong
    or assume incorrectly that single opener == single threaded read/write.

    > > Stick lock_kernel() calls around driver with issues to hard to fix nicely
    > > for 2.4 itself
    > ???

    (eg the OSS sound which I've done - OSS runs under the big kernel lock, its
    simply too foul to correct)

    > > File locking needs checking for races
    > ? Which locking? flock() or VFS one?

    flock/lockf. Willy was/is working on this


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.018 / U:97.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site