Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 18:55:08 +0100 (BST) | From | James Sutherland <> | Subject | Re: Direct access to hardware |
| |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> From: "James Sutherland" <jas88@cam.ac.uk> > > As with some of the Intel CPU bugs, the problem is NOT "invalid ATA > > commands" - it's a matter of VALID commands which are dangerous. FDIV on > > early Pentiums isn't an invalid instruction - it just produces the wrong > > results at times. So the SOFTWARE must do something to avoid this - either > > that, or you need to replace the hardware, which isn't desirable. You do > > something in the OS to prevent these problem commands being used. > > You agree it's a hardware bug. Which implies it should be fixed. In > hardware. Not worked around in software. Sometimes, as with the > pentium bug, you do want to hack things, since doing so works > around the problem and Intel wasn't forth coming with a hardware > fix at first. No functionality was lost with the work around. Not so here. > Functionality will be lost.
What functionality? Remember, only the commands which should NEVER be issued except as part of a low-level diagnostic or maintenance procedure. Since nothing should ever issue these commands anyway except the vendor's own software, no functionality is being lost by disabling them, except for that software, which can be adapted to work around that problem in a way which will also improve it significantly.
James.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |