[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Announce] BKL shifting into drivers and filesystems - beware

On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > I hope you understand why I think that adding reiserfs is a small disturbance
> > compared to continuing revisions of VFS.
> This kind of lock shifting is a major upheaval. It invalidates any device
> driver testing done in the past weeks when we have been slowly moving towards
> more stability.

How does it invalidate such testing? WTF? Alan, I _did_ shift it into the
instances of ->release(). Excuse me, I simply would not submit the patch
otherwise. If you know of the reason why shifting the lock inside
->release() may be a problem (shifting == it _did_ appear inside) -
please, tell. Module refcounting is _not_ one - I've fixed places that
needed ->owner for ->release().

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.117 / U:10.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site