lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)

    WOOHOO,

    SOMEONE HAS SEEN THE LIGHT!!!!

    THANK YOU RYAN!!!!!!!!!

    On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 bodnar42@bodnar42.dhs.org wrote:

    > Alright, actually, after having a cup of coffee (most of which ended up
    > on my keyboard :( ), I fully agree with our poor misunderstood friend
    > Andre. If something is providing access to something at a protocol level,
    > it is its job to make sure that the protocol is not violated.... imagine a
    > TCP/IP stack that let you send invalid packets, that wouldn't go over too
    > well.
    > Violations of the ATA specification should be prevented, if not for
    > protection from users shooting themselves in the foot (I still fail to see
    > this as a threat, BTW), just out of plain old fashioned correctness. Hell,
    > I'd be willing to code a patch for it at this point if I knew what the
    > fsck I was doin'...
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Ryan
    >

    Andre Hedrick
    The Linux ATA/IDE guy


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.019 / U:63.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site