[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: devfs question
In <> John Covici ( wrote:
> Hi. I was reading the readme in the 2.4.0-test2 kernel documentation
> tree for defs when I ran into the following mysterious passage

Grrr. There are STILL described this gaping security hole ? Hosh. You should
use recent enough util-linux and add


instead (I do not remeber well with which version of linux-utils you can
safely use devfs and allow root to use consoles but NOT ptys and serial
ports in the same time). For old linux-utils this suggestion is unsecure
and for new ones it's PLAIN WRONG so what's the point ?

> /etc/securetty
> PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) is supposed to be a flexible
> mechanism for providing better user authentication and access to
> services. Unfortunately, it's also fragile, complex and undocumented
> (check out RedHat 6.1, and probably other distributions as well). PAM
> has problems with symbolic links. Append the following lines to your
> /etc/securetty file:

> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5
> 6
> 7
> 8

> What does this mean since /etc/security is a directory and where
> shhould these lines go anyway?

> Any assistance would be appreciated.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.091 / U:1.276 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site