[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: devfs question
    In <> John Covici ( wrote:
    > Hi. I was reading the readme in the 2.4.0-test2 kernel documentation
    > tree for defs when I ran into the following mysterious passage

    Grrr. There are STILL described this gaping security hole ? Hosh. You should
    use recent enough util-linux and add


    instead (I do not remeber well with which version of linux-utils you can
    safely use devfs and allow root to use consoles but NOT ptys and serial
    ports in the same time). For old linux-utils this suggestion is unsecure
    and for new ones it's PLAIN WRONG so what's the point ?

    > /etc/securetty
    > PAM (Pluggable Authentication Modules) is supposed to be a flexible
    > mechanism for providing better user authentication and access to
    > services. Unfortunately, it's also fragile, complex and undocumented
    > (check out RedHat 6.1, and probably other distributions as well). PAM
    > has problems with symbolic links. Append the following lines to your
    > /etc/securetty file:

    > 1
    > 2
    > 3
    > 4
    > 5
    > 6
    > 7
    > 8

    > What does this mean since /etc/security is a directory and where
    > shhould these lines go anyway?

    > Any assistance would be appreciated.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.024 / U:3.528 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site