lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] drivers/mtd/Config.in
    Date

    tigran@veritas.com said:
    > not only that, but also what Linus said recently, i.e. "a printk when
    > nothing is wrong is a bug" (or something like that). If you look at fs/
    > jffs/inode-v23.c:jffs_read_super() it has a couple of imho unnecessary
    > printk()

    Removing the 'successfully mounted' printk is reasonable - although it's
    only on mount and it's within CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL code so I'd hardly class
    it as essential. The other two definitely look like 'something wrong' cases
    to me, though. I'll chat with you later.

    There is actually a more serious bug fixed in the JFFS code which has
    already made it into my tree - but I'm waiting for Al Viro to give me his
    verdict and any necessary patches before I offload that onto Linus.


    --
    dwmw2



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:3.608 / U:0.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site