Messages in this thread | | | From | David Woodhouse <> | Subject | Re: [patch] drivers/mtd/Config.in | Date | Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:51:00 +0100 |
| |
tigran@veritas.com said: > not only that, but also what Linus said recently, i.e. "a printk when > nothing is wrong is a bug" (or something like that). If you look at fs/ > jffs/inode-v23.c:jffs_read_super() it has a couple of imho unnecessary > printk()
Removing the 'successfully mounted' printk is reasonable - although it's only on mount and it's within CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL code so I'd hardly class it as essential. The other two definitely look like 'something wrong' cases to me, though. I'll chat with you later.
There is actually a more serious bug fixed in the JFFS code which has already made it into my tree - but I'm waiting for Al Viro to give me his verdict and any necessary patches before I offload that onto Linus.
-- dwmw2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |