lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: BSD Licensed files in Linux kernel.
    On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 06:23:27PM -0500, Lee Chin wrote:
    > So now Im slightly confused... when you say

    > "GPL code does not necessarily have to be linked ONLY to GPL code. Rather,
    > GPL code must be linked to GPL code *OR* code which is MORE LIBERAL than the
    > GPL itself"

    > Does this mean to say that If I link my application with glibc, I have to
    > gove away my code under either GPL or a more liberal licence?

    glibc is NOT GPL. It's LGPL. There is a major serious difference.
    And the answer to your question is basically - no.

    > Thank You
    > Lee

    Mike
    --
    Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com
    (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 331-2437 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
    NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
    PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.021 / U:31.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site