[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: iproute and 2.3 question
    On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:28:01PM +0200, fooler wrote:
    > Andi Kleen wrote:
    > >
    > > It has not been integrated, because equalization on the routing cache
    > > layer does not work well (not fine grained enough or too slow)
    > >
    > hello andi,
    > can you explain it further?

    Linux has a routing cache that caches routing table lookups. This
    is called the destination cache. A destination cache entry is tied
    to a specific destination, which means only a single neighbour
    on a multipath route. To use multipath routing for load balancing
    requires dropping the destination entry after every use, so that
    another neighbour in the multipath could be looked up (the destination
    cache knows nothing about multipaths, that is all encapsulated in the
    FIB or routing table)

    Dropping them all the time does not work well and is slow. It is also
    not finegrained enough (because the decision occurs to early) to get an
    even load balancing

    Multipath routing is only useful for failover when a device is down in Linux.

    For load balancing you can use the existing eql, teql and bonding devices,
    which work at a lower layer and avoid these problems.


    This is like TV. I don't like TV.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.019 / U:0.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site