[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Location of shmfs; devfs automagics
Thierry Vignaud <> writes:

> "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> >
> > Two alerts regarding filesystem hierarchy:
> >
> > The location that has been suggested, /var/shm, is a very bad choice.
> > /var is a potentially-large filesystem which isn't necessarily
> > available during the early boot sequence, may be remote, etc.
> > Furthermore, /var is used for on-disk data.
> >
> > The proper location for entities like this is /dev. The only sensible
> > location for this is /dev/shm.
> then if you choose to umount your devfs in order to use the old /dev/
> entries, you get an error message, have to umount /dev/shm first, which
> may be used by apps, ....

The suggestion for /var/shm is gone. I would also vote for /dev/shm
but didn't like the above clashes during integration. Personally I
mount shm fs on /dev/shm since we do not need a default any more.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.132 / U:1.984 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site