Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:27:32 +0100 (BST) | From | Tim Waugh <> | Subject | Re: __setup return value |
| |
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> When is a driver supposed to return 0 from a __setup function? When > it can't parse the options? Or when there's a possibility that the > option is intended for another driver?
No-one seems to want to answer this, or else everyone missed it.
Is it worth me making a patch to change the behaviour of those drivers that return 0 on error (rather that when the option could be used by another driver) to return 1 instead?
Tim. */
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |