lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Keyboard rate question..
Date
From
> Well, not quite.
>
> Imagine your kernel is having awfull interrupt latencies. Then HW
> autorepeat makes sense and no SW autorepeat can be as good.

Assuming you have an interval timer this is incorrect and both are the same
or the SW one potentially better.

If you have an interval timer you can at any point reconstruct the number of
key repeats lost and generate them as a block. If you have a repeating keyboard
you are constrained by the buffering on the controller


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.075 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site