lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Avoiding OOM on overcommit...?
    Date
    From
    > Alan, does it make sense, in ANY situation, to disable overcommit? Because
    > AFAIK, a system without overcommit would always have to kill processes
    > before an equivalent overcommitting system would.

    You disable overcommit in some situations where you expect to see it occuring
    regularly or where the cost is too high. Such systems generally aren't unix
    and often are embedded controllers that dont even have a memory allocator

    > It seems to me that this whole overcommit debate is just avoiding the real
    > problem, which is how to decide which tasks to kill.

    Which Rik van Riel has a very good handle on


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.020 / U:0.132 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site