lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] bsd disklabel detection
Thanks for the patch!
I wondered about

> -#define BSDI_PARTITION 0xb7 /* BSDI Partition ID */
> +#define BSDI_PARTITION 0x9f /* BSDI Partition ID */

You write:

> The first patch is fairly trivial: it changes the value for the unused
> BSDI_PARTITION flag (which was wrong: I have BSDI 2.1 and 4.1 here, and
> both of them failed to see their own partitions after changing their flag
> to 0xb7).

but the use of 0xb7 and 0xb8 for BSDI seems well established.
Is going to 0x9f a recent change? Or are these different systems?
Does the BSDI fdisk have a list of types built-in?

For the time being I suppose we should accept both 0xb7 and 0x9f.

Andries

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean