Messages in this thread | | | From | James Sutherland <> | Subject | Re: Overcommitable memory?? | Date | Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:29:58 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:58:33 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>[cc list trimmed] > >On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, James Sutherland wrote about OOM handling: > >>Yes; the current handling is about as good as it can get without >>per-user resource management, which is a long way off. > >Uh, come again? The current handling is to kill processes at random. I >wouldn't call that "as good as it can get...."
No it isn't. Read the earlier posts.
James.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |