lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Overcommitable memory??
Date
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:58:33 -0800 (PST), you wrote:

>[cc list trimmed]
>
>On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, James Sutherland wrote about OOM handling:
>
>>Yes; the current handling is about as good as it can get without
>>per-user resource management, which is a long way off.
>
>Uh, come again? The current handling is to kill processes at random. I
>wouldn't call that "as good as it can get...."

No it isn't. Read the earlier posts.


James.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.047 / U:1.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site