Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Avoiding OOM on overcommit...? | Date | Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:36:30 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
orc@pell.portland.or.us (david parsons) said: > In article <linux.kernel.45hadsgku4f59qae3ouohgbk7k4p6lc5os@4ax.com>, > James Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >Now we'll take a WWW server, with 100 processes forked, all sharing > >most of the image. You just blew 2Gb or so of my swap space, to > >achieve - nothing.
> Okay, I'm getting really curious here: what application do you > have that requires that you run 100 copies of a web server each > with 20mb of unique writable data?
100 concurrent accesses to your site, no memory overcommit. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |