[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Overcommitable memory??
    Den 17-Mar-00 10:04:27 skrev James Sutherland følgende om "Re: Overcommitable memory??":

    > Yes. There may be a few, specialist applications where you truly want/need
    > overcommit disabled (embedded apps, perhaps?) - but for the desktop/server
    > market, overcommit is almost essential.

    Lost of non-Linux systems work fine without it. Do you actually have any
    numbers to back up your claims?

    A programmer can waste quite a lot of time hunting for non-existant
    bugs to explain crashes caused by a kernel which can't keep count of its
    memory. Been there, done that.


    | Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: |
    | Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: |
    | mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC |
    | Windows NT is the OS of the future and always will be... |

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.022 / U:114.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site