[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: patch: reiserfs for 2.3.49
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 03:14:08PM +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> something is wrong. I think we need extra VM infrastructure to deal
> reliably with this: both ext3 and reiserfs will be hurt by the need
> to build whole transactions before committing stuff to disk, as we
> may run out of memory mid-transaction while the rest of the
> transaction is still pinned.

Why does the transaction have to be maintained in memory? What's the big
deal with eating up journal space for a transaction that may be aborted
anyway? As long as it's not marked committed, upon a possible recovery,
things should roll back automatically.

Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly and be right all the time, or not work at all and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.187 / U:7.632 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site