Messages in this thread | | | From | "Eric Youngdale" <> | Subject | Re: 2.3.99pre1, ide-scsi, scsi, modules | Date | Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:33:19 -0500 |
| |
----- Original Message ----- From: Arjan van de Ven <adve@oce.nl> To: Eric Youngdale <eric@andante.org> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 10:19 AM Subject: Re: 2.3.99pre1, ide-scsi, scsi, modules
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003152224130.14829-200000@gwyn.tux.org> you wrote: > > Matt- > > > Try the enclosed patch. It corrects two issues, actually - it > > fixes the one whereby the dependency isn't right for ide-scsi, and it also > > should correct the issue of using USB compiled into the kernel and module > > support is turned off (because the SCSI entrypoints for modules aren't > > built if modules are turned off). > > Ehh... Isn't the ide-scsi question asked before the SCSI question? > (It was so a year a go, and the only way to "solve" this, was by > adding a #warning / #error to it, you should be able to find it in the > code)
Yes and no. If you are using menuconfig or xconfig then it isn't a huge problem as you are not required to navigate the thing in any particular order. If you are running the vanilla configure script then yes, you are right.
> Forward-dependencies ARE a big problem for the current Config.in system, > and the only way to solve them (this is not the only one) is to add a second > pass to the config scripts. (It can be done, my patch just didn't make it > into the kernel).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |