[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Some questions about linux kernel.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:

> > > People have actually tried this and my patch seems to
> > > catch the hog just fine :)
> >
> > Any sufficiently well-coded bomb is indistinguishable from an innocent
> > unattended package :-)
> Which is why the solution is two-part:
> * An OOM killer good enough to handle the "some process went insane"
> case. From all accounts, Rik's patch does this well.
> * Comprehensive per-uid resource accounting (the beancounting work)
> to guard against malicious users. This would be great for 2.5
> (but, of course, that was said about 2.3 as well..) A full
> implementation would also fix DoSes against users using kernel
> memory (network buffers, page table mappings) which is a lot
> nastier than simple VM exhaustion.

Yes, this would be nice... ISTR someone said they were working on
something similar??


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.141 / U:2.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site