[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Overcommitable memory??
Den 13-Mar-00 15:01:14 skrev Richard B. Johnson følgende om "Re: Overcommitable memory?? Re: Some questions about linux kernel.":

> Of course, if you don't have a swap-file, there is nothing you can
> do. Some persons claim that a swap-file isn't necessary and should not
> be used. They come from the "Flat Earth Society".

Swap isn't necessary. Swap is just a cheap and slow alternative to RAM
chips, that's why most people use it, hoping mostly inactive parts of
memory have to be implemented as swap, but swap isn't necessary. It is
quite possible to run production Linux systems without any swap. Been
there, done that.


| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: |
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: |
| mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC |
| If a train station is where a train stops, what is a workstation then? |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.135 / U:25.072 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site