Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:22:11 -0500 (EST) | From | Gregory Maxwell <> | Subject | Re: patch: reiserfs for 2.3.49 |
| |
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > > Before slaming someone, take a moment to look at the patch. > > You bet that I did.
I'm sorry for coming off so strongly.
[snip] > > They removed the VFS bastardazation. :) > > Yeah, except that if you will look intofs/reiserfs you will see a lot of > code that was obviously unmaintained for a year or so. And interating with > VFS. > > In other words, if "Nobody cares if reiserfs is totally out of sync with > VFS" is a valid position - fine. But then I'ld like to have that statement > written and signed in blood. By Hans and his team. I don't think that > such position is valid for anything included into the tree. Moreover, it > pretty much makes inclusion into the tree meaningless.
Try to be easier on them. I certantly couldn't design a sophisticated tree based file system, mange users, fix bugs, AND track the Linux kernel API at the same time. :)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |