Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Mar 2000 16:52:35 -0500 (EST) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: 2.3.51 How come... |
| |
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Hello all, > > Just upgraded to 2.3.51 earlier today. In the course of plugging > in a suggestion from Linus concerning shmget errors (mounting shm file > system DID fix that problem) I noticed a rather strange anomoly. File > systems which use to NOT show up with "df" now do show up with wierd numbers.
Weird number being (unsigned long)(-1). statfs(2) says that all undefined fields must be filled with that. Apparently df(1) disagrees...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |