[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but...

On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, William Montgomery wrote:
> >Process B is SCHED_FIFO waiting via sigpause().
> >Process A is SCHED_FIFO running and does signal() to Process B.
> >Process A waits in sigpause().
> >Process A run time in this case is very short, probably shorter that
> >free_inode loop.
> What has the above scenario to to do with free_inodes in first place?
I thought this scenario could occur during free_inodes and that it might
be a case where the single pass conditional schedule could fail.
In light of your explanation, however, it does not appear to apply.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.119 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site