lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux's future: //posix/ipc, //root and so on ?
Date
Followup to:  <ADoh0luu76@khim.sch57.msk.ru>
By author: "Khimenko Victor" <khim@sch57.msk.ru>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I've just reread Linus's notes about IPC filesystem and to me idea about
> metafiles "above" usual root looks great: //proc for /proc, //dev for devfs
> and so on. No need to mount in every chroot environment, not need to manual
> mount anything at all, easy change of root: just umount //root and mount
> other thing there. And POSIX agrees that //root or //proc CAN be special
> so all is correct. So just kernel changes are needed. Right ? Not quite:
>

PLEASE PRETTY PLEASE don't use //. It causes HUGE amounts of trouble,
since // frequently shows up due to (inappropriate) concatentation of
paths, or is removed due to overly happy canonicalization.
If you're going to use over-paths use /.. instead.

However, I don't see any reason to use above-root paths at
all... especially for stuff like the ipc filesystem. Just mount it as
usual.

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans