[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PPC should not use -fno-builtin (was Re: 2.3.47 imac build?)
    On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:

    > So... you are choosing to lose extremely valuable optimizations because
    > of a few prototype warnings? This logic seems bogus to me... it also

    OK, the problem is that gcc expects size_t to be an unsigned int. We use
    unsigned long for size_t in the kernel because we want it to be 64 bits on
    64-bit PPCs (like it is on the other 64-bit platforms). Gcc doesn't like a
    prototype for memcpy which has an unsigned long for the 3rd argument
    (unless you use -fno-builtin).

    The only optimization we lose with -fno-builtin (that I can see) is that
    the compiler won't turn explicit calls to memcpy with a small constant 3rd
    argument (<= 32) into a sequence of inline loads and stores. (It still
    does small struct copies with inline loads and stores even with

    Paul Mackerras, Senior Open Source Researcher, Linuxcare, Inc.
    +61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax,
    Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.021 / U:8.908 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site