lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: mmap/munmap semantics
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Benjamin C.R. LaHaise wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > So how can I throw away a dirty (shared) mapping of a file without
> > generating disk io? Remember, I do not care about the contents of the file
> > at the mmap place.
> > A possible solution would be to be able to convert a shared mapping to
> > a private one? If I'm the only user of the shared mapping (so its a
> > virtually private one) this should be easy - just "disconnect" it. In the
> > other case I do not really know how to handle this.
>
> The most portable and easiest way to achieve this behaviour right now is
> to use individual files or shm segments for the shared mappings. Using
> SysV shared memory will get you the most performance since it won't get
> written back to disk early (like mmaped files). If that doesn't give you
> enough space, I strongly recommend using 1 file per shared "segment",
> since the semantics you get by truncating and then extending the mapping
> are exactly what you want. As a bonus, this technique works on
> filesystems that don't support files with holes =)

Yes, but unfortunately the individual file approach does not work in case
we (ideally) want to operate on a whole disk...

Richard.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans