lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: What /proc should contain [was: /proc/driver/microcode]
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch wrote:
>Ricky Beam wrote:
>> Ok, so when did the non-procfs interface for process data go away? (I'm
>> assuming _years_ ago. There _were_ syscalls for it at one point.)

Correction, I'm thinking of _memory_ syscalls -- i.e. meminfo data.

>Nope, the state of the art back then was to poke around in /dev/kmem,
>guided by a possibly obsolete symbol table, and blissfully ignorant of
>any locking or such.
>
>Whenever any of the kernel-internal tables changed, ps and friends
>died a horrible death or started generating strangely incorrect
>information, and there was a week of confusion in linux-kernel.

Yeah, those were the days. Nothing quite like watching ps core dump
or display several 1000% cpu utilization :-) (This was _before_ SMP
children.)

--Ricky



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.097 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site