Messages in this thread | | | From | Benno Senoner <> | Subject | Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but... | Date | Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:27:03 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, William Montgomery wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Benno Senoner wrote: > > > > I fixed the buffer.c code according to Ingo and removed a > > > conditional_schedule from mark_buffer_clean in fs.h as spotted by Andrea. > > > I have been testing for over 18hrs and no stuck processes yet. > > > > Interesting, what kind of latencies are you getting now ? > > 1.1ms to 1.2ms using your rtc_latency test.
excellent ! are you runnig with RTC HT=2048 ?
> > > If the patch looks stable to you can you post a 2.2.13 or 2.2.14 patch , > > so that I can benchmark it ? > > > Its kind of hacked up right now, current kernel is 2.2.14 + 2.2.14aa7 > patch + lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 patch + ikd patch. I have not tried the > changes on a bare 2.2.14 and I would recommend 2.2.14aa7 as a baseline. > > I was hoping to get more feedback before posting, also I like to > defer to Ingo for official post.
Agreed.
I was wondering if backing out the inode freeing changes, increases latencies in your tests.
William, thank you very much for your heavy testing.
Benno.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |