Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:53:52 +0200 (EET) | From | Sergey Kubushin <> | Subject | Re: new or old devfs naming scheme (Was: Re: devfs howto) |
| |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch wrote:
> Sergey Kubushin wrote: > > BTW, why /dev/disCs, not /dev/disKs ? :)) > > Seagate naming ? As opposed to IBM, Maxtor, Quantum, Toshiba, Fujitsu, > Hitachi, Samsung, NEC ("disk" or "disk drive"), and Western Digital > (just "drive").
And it is not such thing as "disc" anywhere in the kernel. We know ide-disk.o, we know /dev/dsk/ from others...
I do know that it's colour which is right, not color. And I do know that it's disc which is in English, not disk. But it could be confusing to remember that it's disc in devfs and disk everywhere else... No matter which one is wrong, it has to be consistent...
=========================================================================== Sergey Kubushin aka the Tamer < > The impossible we do immediately. e-mail: ksi@ksi-linux.com SK320-RIPE < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. ===========================================================================
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |