[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Question about stat()
    In article <>,
    Matti Aarnio <> wrote:

    > Amicable goal, however I do suggest that programmer mindset is
    > that "time_t*" is time with ONE SECOND resolution.

    programmer mindset has also included such things as

    sizeof(int) == sizeof(*)


    sizeof(long) == sizeof(*)

    And, just like what happened in these cases (well, it's still happening
    in the sizeof(long) == sizeof(*) case) people will learn.

    I'd love to see time64_t be a non-scalar type and force people to
    use time64diff(), time64add(), time64sub(), et al to extract the
    contents of it instead of the seductively simple approach of using
    scalars that we have now.

    > If you want to create a new type, call it, say:
    > nanotime64_t


    david parsons \bi/ date_t would work.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.019 / U:76.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site