Messages in this thread | | | From | (H. Peter Anvin) | Subject | Re: LILO falsely reports big kernel? | Date | 21 Feb 2000 15:47:15 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10002201356570.3262-100000@maverick.riffe.us.eu.org> By author: Nate Riffe <inkblot@geocities.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > L-K, > > Just now LILO has reported that my freshly compiled kernel was too big > (472855 bytes) which is smaller than some of the other kernels installed > here (617431 bytes, for example). Oddly enough, when I recompiled using > bzImage instead of zImage, I got a kernel 1 byte bigger that LILO > accepted. Is there some logical explanation for this behavior? >
Yes. The "b" in "bzImage" stands for "big".
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |