[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Question about stat()
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> > We could do with a much more precise time_t structure for the future,
> > methinks.

> How about 64-bit nanoseconds? This fixes the year-2038 problem too.
> (this is for the VFS and new filesystems)

How about calling the new struct 'time_t64', it could be a long long
containing nanoseconds.

Thus existing code won't break.

Signatures suck.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.250 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site