lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] shm fs v2 against 2.3.41
Hi,

On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 19:07:20 +0900, GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
said:

> I guess almost all users have no shmpath (default: /var/shm),
> and they maybe make a dir and have to mount it.
> IMHO, it is better to change that sysv shared memory works
> samely, whenever shmfs is not mounted. Is it feasible,
> or only my mistaken ?

Even tools as fundamental as "ps" don't work until /proc is mounted, so
I don't see anything wrong with requiring shmfs to be mounted for sysV
shared memory to work correctly.

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans