lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] shm fs v2 against 2.3.41
    Hi,

    On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 19:07:20 +0900, GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
    said:

    > I guess almost all users have no shmpath (default: /var/shm),
    > and they maybe make a dir and have to mount it.
    > IMHO, it is better to change that sysv shared memory works
    > samely, whenever shmfs is not mounted. Is it feasible,
    > or only my mistaken ?

    Even tools as fundamental as "ps" don't work until /proc is mounted, so
    I don't see anything wrong with requiring shmfs to be mounted for sysV
    shared memory to work correctly.

    --Stephen

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.019 / U:89.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site