[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux Status For 2.3.x: v 2.3.43

On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> > Probable point where we call it being shrink_mmap(). Other candidates?
> shrink_mmap() is the obvious place. The biggest problem is that we will
> need to export enough functionality to allow other filesystems to
> hook their own data structures onto the page cache LRU list, so that
> filesystem-specific caches can be reclaimed in the same shrink_mmap()
> loop.

Why? If we include the pages via the standard functions those pages _will_
end up in lru_cache, no matter what cache they belong to...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.057 / U:36.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site