Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:17:20 -0800 (PST) | From | Tigran Aivazian <> | Subject | Re: why does mtrr use suser() and not capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)? |
| |
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote: > > So I'd rather that MTRR was left alone until the house of capabilities > is cleaned up. > Sorry Richard, but I was fiddling with mtrr.c for P6 ucode stuff so I couldn't stand the temptation to cleanup the suser->capable bits. However, if you feel strongly about it, surely Linus can ignore that part of my patch :)
Regards, Tigran.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |