lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: why does mtrr use suser() and not capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)?
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> So I'd rather that MTRR was left alone until the house of capabilities
> is cleaned up.
>
Sorry Richard, but I was fiddling with mtrr.c for P6 ucode stuff so I
couldn't stand the temptation to cleanup the suser->capable bits. However,
if you feel strongly about it, surely Linus can ignore that part of my
patch :)

Regards,
Tigran.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.867 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site