[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] isa_{read,write}{w,l} fixed
    > Philipp's point is still valid though, u32 is only 2 byte aligned on

    Alan's point. My point was you could rely on gcc not padding structures
    when you always explicitly padded to natural alignment boundaries. Eg
    when you do struct { u16 s; u32 l; } you deserve to get burned, but when
    you do struct { u16 s; u16 unused; u32 l; } you can expect gcc not to
    be smart on you.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.018 / U:5.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site