[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Capabilities
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:

> [0] My thinking is somewhat slow today, but as I recall the
> fs caps implementation wants to include all three sets,
> yes?
> In the later POSIX drafts, I believe the fs capability sets have been
> dropped down to two, "allowed" and "forced".

That makes a lot of sense from a comprehensibility standpoint :-)

If process has CAP_FOO-p, will it get EPERM (EACCESS?) if it tries
to exec() a binary with that capability "forced"?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.148 / U:94.152 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site