lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Capabilities
    On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:

    > [0] My thinking is somewhat slow today, but as I recall the
    > fs caps implementation wants to include all three sets,
    > yes?
    >
    > In the later POSIX drafts, I believe the fs capability sets have been
    > dropped down to two, "allowed" and "forced".

    That makes a lot of sense from a comprehensibility standpoint :-)

    If process has CAP_FOO-p, will it get EPERM (EACCESS?) if it tries
    to exec() a binary with that capability "forced"?

    Matthew.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.020 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site