lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :((
Hi all.

>> I can tell that latest _STABLE_ kernel is 2.1.125 which does run
>> our primary NS with several thousands zones having a 294 days
>> uptime now. 2.2.xx is beta,

> Maybe for your precise configuration. I can kill 2.1.125 in a
> few seconds 8)

Same here - I gave up with 2.1.125 because of the flaws in it, and am
thankful most of them were fixed in time for 2.2.0.

>> Can you point me to ANY 2.2.xx (announced to be _STABLE_)
>> kernel, which does at least build with all drivers enabled
>> and modularized outta the box ? Can

> I build all the 2.2.x kernel trees that way. Routinely. And
> other people run randomized build patterns over them

I've built EVERY one of the 2.2 series kernels several times for
several different configurations, and I've yet to find one that was
unstable, announced or otherwise.

Best wishes from Riley.

* Copyright (C) 1999, Memory Alpha Systems.
* All rights and wrongs reserved.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.175 / U:1.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site