lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] shm fs v2 against 2.3.41

On 02-Feb-00 Jamie Lokier wrote:
> If the VFS were going to be changed so radically, I'd much rather "//"
> were reserved for something useful like URLs

Since URLs don't really form a useful namespace, it seems like a bit of a
waste. On the other hand, // seems like a both nasty and unnecessary namespace
trick anyway.

If you want to graft things into the namespace, what's wrong with mount?

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.982 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site