lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]
    On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote:
    > At 08:12 PM 12/9/2000 -0600, Rene wrote:
    > >I think part of the problem is that there are other things labeled
    > >DANGEROUS that actually do work fairly reliably (offhand, I'm thinking
    > >off the IDE config stuff..). Perhaps it needs to explicitely say
    > >'This is broken and is gauranteed to destroy your data. Do not use it'
    > >
    > >The 'DANGEROUS' label seems to suggest that it -may- destroy data, which
    > >leads to the 'it won't happen to me' mentality.
    >
    > For what it's worth, I absolutely agree with this. I have the same
    > impression when I just see the word "dangerous".

    Why not call a spade a spade and label it BROKEN. I do think that's
    stronger than DANGEROUS.

    - |Daryll
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.022 / U:35.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site