Messages in this thread |  | | From | Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <> | Subject | Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] | Date | Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:50:47 +0100 (MET) |
| |
"Peter Samuelson wrote:" > [Michael Warfield] > > This thing is not armed and dangerous due to an act of ommision. > > It's live and active only through three acts of commision. > > We could make it *four* acts of commission. (: (: (: > > diff -urk~ fs/Config.in > --- fs/Config.in~ Mon Nov 13 01:43:42 2000 > +++ fs/Config.in Thu Dec 7 23:00:34 2000 > @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ > tristate 'Minix fs support' CONFIG_MINIX_FS > > tristate 'NTFS file system support (read only)' CONFIG_NTFS_FS > -dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL > +dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON $CONFIG_NTFS_FS $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL > +dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS filesystems' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON > > tristate 'OS/2 HPFS file system support' CONFIG_HPFS_FS
Of course, you know that it *WILL NOT* work as CONFIG_MORON is nowhere defined ... ?
Andrzej -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Technical University of Gdansk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |