lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: test12-pre6
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> error = -EPERM;
> if (IS_IMMUTABLE(inode) || IS_APPEND(inode))
> goto dput_and_out;

also, while we are here -- are you sure that EPERM is a good idea for
IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)? Other parts of Linux return EACCES in this
case. Maybe it would be more consistent to do EACCES here too? This would
simply mean remove IS_IMMUTABLE() from the above if because
vfs_permission() does return -EACCES if we ask MAY_WRITE for IS_IMMUTABLE
inode.

Since, the SuSv2 standard is silent on the issue of immutable files (they
are Linux-specific) then it may make sense to be consistent?

Regards,
Tigran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:51    [W:0.076 / U:5.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site