lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] inode dirty blocks
Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> OK, guys, I think I've got it:

Yes, you have.

Two machines, four hours, zero failures.

This is with

- test12-pre4
- aviro bforget patch
- UnlockPage() removed from vmscan.c:623
- and


--- linux-2.4.0-test12-pre4/fs/ext2/inode.c Mon Dec 4 21:07:12 2000
+++ linux-akpm/fs/ext2/inode.c Tue Dec 5 08:46:38 2000
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
raw_inode->i_block[0] = cpu_to_le32(kdev_t_to_nr(inode->i_rdev));
else for (block = 0; block < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; block++)
raw_inode->i_block[block] = inode->u.ext2_i.i_data[block];
- mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bh, inode);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
if (do_sync) {
ll_rw_block (WRITE, 1, &bh);
wait_on_buffer (bh);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:51    [W:0.060 / U:1.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site