lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: PROBLEM: multiple mount of devices possible 2.4.0-test1 - 2.4.0-test13-pre4
Date
From
In article <Pine.GSO.4.21.0012301829190.4082-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> writes:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Ton Hospel wrote:
>
>> It should still need a special flag or something, since it's
>> impossible for userspace to check this atomically.
>
> To check _what_? Having the same tree mounted in several places is
> allowed. End of story. Atomicity of any kind is a non-issue - if you
> have processes that do not cooperate and do random mounts you are
> getting exactly what you are asking for.
>

I wasn't talking about mounting the same device on different mount points.
If you ask for that, it's good that you nowadays you can get that (though
even there it might be a good idea to let the filesystem say if it can
support that or not)

I was talking about avoiding that the same device gets multiple mounted
at the SAME place, e.g. when doing mount -a, which is often used as a
quick way to get the new entries in /etc/fstab

That would also be no problem if there were a standard about e.g. always
flocking /etc/mtab. But as far as I know there isn't such a standard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.030 / U:5.916 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site