[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3)
Followup to:  <>
By author: Igmar Palsenberg <>
In newsgroup:
> > Indeed, you are correct. Is vpnd broken then, for assuming
> > that it can gather the required randomness in one read?
> Yep. It assumes that if the required randommness numbers aren't met a read
> to /dev/random will block.
> And it's not the only program that assumes this : I also did.
> /dev/random is called a blocking random device, which more or less implies
> that it will totally block. I suggest we put this somewhere in the kernel
> docs, since lots of people out there assume that it totally blocks.

That's pretty much ALWAYS wrong -- for pipes, sockets, you name it. A
blocking read() will only block if there is nothing to read at all.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:51    [W:0.056 / U:4.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site