[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: /dev/random probs in 2.4test(12-pre3)
Followup to:  <>
By author: Igmar Palsenberg <>
In newsgroup:
> Hmm.. Some came to mind :
> Making /dev/random block if the amount requirements aren't met makes sense
> to me. If I request x bytes of random stuff, and get less, I probably
> reread /dev/random. If it's entropy pool is exhausted it makes sense to be
> to block.

Yes, it does, but it doesn't make any sense to block if there are data
to be read. If you need a larger read then you should advance your
pointer and try again with the residual size, or use fread() which
does this for you.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:51    [W:0.110 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site