Messages in this thread |  | | From | Russell King <> | Subject | test13-pre5: Double flush_cache_page? | Date | Fri, 29 Dec 2000 11:52:08 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
Hi,
Is the following really intentional?
vmscan.c:122:
flush_cache_page(vma, address); if (!pte_dirty(pte)) goto drop_pte; ... flush_cache_page(vma, address); if (page->mapping) {
Nothing accesses the actual page between the two flush_cache_page() calls, the first one was added in test13-pre5. Should test13-pre5 have removed the second instance? _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |