Messages in this thread |  | | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove __mark_buffer_dirty and related changes | Date | Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:31:23 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
Marcelo Tosatti writes: > +int mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh) > { > + if (!atomic_set_buffer_dirty(bh)) { > + return 1; > + } > + return 0; > }
Any particular reason why you don't to:
return !atomic_set_buffer_dirty(bh);
which generates better code on some systems? _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |