lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove __mark_buffer_dirty and related changes
Date
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> +int mark_buffer_dirty(struct buffer_head *bh)
> {
> + if (!atomic_set_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }

Any particular reason why you don't to:

return !atomic_set_buffer_dirty(bh);

which generates better code on some systems?
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.038 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site