lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)


On Thursday, December 28, 2000 16:49:14 +0100 Daniel Phillips <phillips@innominate.de> wrote:

[ dbench 48 test on the anon space mapping patch ]

>
> This benchmark doesn't seem to suffer a lot from noise, so the 7%
> slowdown with your patch likely real.
>

Ok, page_launder is supposed to run through the inactive dirty
list twice, and on the second run, it wants to start i/o. But,
if the page is dirty, writepage is called on the first run. With
my patch, this flushes lots more data than it used to.

I have writepage doing all the i/o, and try_to_free_buffers
only waits on it. This diff makes it so writepage is only called
on the second loop through the inactive dirty list, could you
please give it a try (slightly faster in my tests).

Linus and Rik are cc'd in to find out if this is a good idea in
general.

-chris

--- linux-test13-pre4/mm/vmscan.c Sat Dec 23 13:14:26 2000
+++ linux/mm/vmscan.c Thu Dec 28 15:02:08 2000
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@
goto page_active;

/* Can't start IO? Move it to the back of the list */
- if (!can_get_io_locks) {
+ if (!launder_loop || !can_get_io_locks) {
list_del(page_lru);
list_add(page_lru, &inactive_dirty_list);
UnlockPage(page);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans