Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [Patch] shmmin behaviour back to 2.2 behaviour | Date | Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:49:30 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > So should we go for SUSv2? > > No. > I regard shm* as obsolete. New programs will probably not use it. > So, the less we change the better. Moreover, the SUSv2 text is broken.
There are fundmental things shm* can do that mmap cannot. Does posix shm handle those (leaving segments alive but unattached being the obvious one)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |