lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Patch] shmmin behaviour back to 2.2 behaviour
Date
From
> > So should we go for SUSv2?
>
> No.
> I regard shm* as obsolete. New programs will probably not use it.
> So, the less we change the better. Moreover, the SUSv2 text is broken.

There are fundmental things shm* can do that mmap cannot. Does posix shm
handle those (leaving segments alive but unattached being the obvious one)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.053 / U:7.816 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site